Case: A Second Victim Support Program in Pediatrics: Successes and Challenges to Implementation

Published:February 03, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.01.011

      Highlights

      • There is a need to comprehensively evaluate second victim peer-support programs.
      • We examined the RISE program using two surveys and a mixed-method analysis.
      • Adaptive design and interplay with organizational culture contributed to success.
      • Challenges included varied preference for support and overcoming cultural barriers.
      • Organizational culture can be an obstacle and facilitator for RISE-like programs.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      While there is growing attention to making health care safer, there has been less emphasis on helping health care workers to cope with stressful patient related events (these workers are commonly referred to as second victims). We used the RISE (Resilience In Stressful Events) peer support program at the Johns Hopkins Hospital as a case study for evaluating effectiveness, and identifying barriers to addressing the needs of second victims.

      Design and Methods

      The study used a mixed-method approach that included: 1) quantitative analysis of surveys of health care workers in the Department of Pediatrics before RISE implementation and four years after, and 2) content analysis of open-ended commentaries about respondents' experience with seeking second victim support, as well as feedback on RISE.

      Results

      Survey response rates were 22.4% and 23.3% respectively. Quantitative analysis showed that respondents at the later time point were more likely to contact an organizational support structure, and had greater awareness of the availability of support. Respondents were very likely (93%) to recommend RISE to others. Content analysis identified barriers to using RISE: overcoming blame culture, need to promote the initiative, and need for more staff time to handle adverse events. Respondents reported varied preferences for the support format and specific support interventions.

      Conclusions

      The mixed-method approach allowed a comprehensive evaluation of RISE and provided some evidence for its effectiveness in supporting pediatric health care workers.

      Practice Implications

      The findings suggest an important role of organizational culture in second victim support program implementation and evaluation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Benn J.
        • Koutantji M.
        • Wallace L.
        • Spurgeon P.
        • Rejman M.
        • Healey A.
        • Vincent C.
        Feedback from incident reporting: Information and action to improve patient safety.
        Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2009; 18: 11-21https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.024166
        • Burlison J.D.
        • Scott S.D.
        • Browne E.K.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Hoffman J.M.
        The second victim experience and support tool: Validation of an organizational resource for assessing second victim effects and the quality of support resources.
        Journal of Patient Safety. 2017; 13: 93-102https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000129
        • Coursera
        Psychological first aid.
        (Retrieved from)
        Johns Hopkins University
        https://www.coursera.org/learn/psychological-first-aid#
        Date: 2017
        • Devilly G.J.
        • Cotton P.
        Psychological debriefing and the workplace: Defining a concept, controversies and guidelines for intervention.
        Australian Psychologist. 2003; 38: 144-150https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707147
        • dos Santos R.A.
        • Moreira M.C.N.
        Resilience and death: The nursing professional in the care of children and adolescents with life-limiting illnesses.
        Ciencia E Saude Coletiva. 2014; 19: 4869-4878https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141912.18862013
        • Edmondson A.
        Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
        Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999; 44: 350-383https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
        • Edrees H.
        • Brock D.M.
        • Wu A.W.
        • McCotter P.I.
        • Hofeldt R.
        • Shannon S.E.
        • White A.A.
        The experiences of risk managers in providing emotional support for health care workers after adverse events.
        Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. 2016; 35: 14-21https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21219
        • Edrees H.
        • Connors C.
        • Paine L.
        • Norvell M.
        • Taylor H.
        • Wu A.W.
        Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: A case study.
        BMJ Open. 2016; 6https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708
        • Edrees H.
        • Wu A.W.
        Does one size fit all? Assessing the need for organizational second victim support programs.
        Journal of Patient Safety. 2017; (Jun 30. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000321
        • Edrees H.H.
        • Paine L.A.
        • Feroli E.R.
        • Wu A.W.
        Health care workers as second victims of medical errors.
        Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej. 2011; 121: 101-107
        • Halifax J.
        • Black A.
        • Rushton C.
        Upaya program: G.R.A.C.E.: Training in compassion-based interactions in the clinician/patient encounter.
        (Retrieved from)
        • Health Quality Ontario
        • Lambrinos A.
        • Holubowich C.
        Patient safety learning systems: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.
        Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series. 2017; 17: 1-23
        • Jenson J.M.
        • Fraser M.W.
        Social policy for children & families: A risk and resilience perspective.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif2006
        • Joint Commission
        Looking at sentinel events along the continuum of patient safety.
        Joint Commission Perspectives. 2010; 30: 3-5
        • King S.
        Josie's story.
        Atlantic Monthly Press, New York2009
        • Kohn L.T.
        • Corrigan J.M.
        • Donaldson M.S.
        To err is human: Building a safer health system.
        National Academic Press, 2000
        • Krzan K.D.
        • Merandi J.
        • Morvay S.
        • Mirtallo J.
        Implementation of a “second victim” program in a pediatric hospital.
        American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2015; 72: 563-567https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp140650
        • Leitch L.
        • Sutton L.
        An introduction to the social resilience model.
        (Retrieved from)
        • Malterud K.
        Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines.
        Lancet. 2001; 358: 483-488https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
        • National Quality Forum
        Safe practices for better healthcare—2010 update: A consensus report.
        NQF, Washington, DC2010
        • Pratt S.
        • Kenney L.
        • Scott S.D.
        • Wu A.W.
        How to develop a second victim support program: A toolkit for health care organizations.
        Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2012; 38 (193): 235-240https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(12)38030-6
        • Pronovost P.
        • Weast B.
        • Rosenstein B.
        • Sexton J.B.
        • Holzmueller C.G.
        • Paine L.
        • Rubin H.R.
        Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program.
        Journal of Patient Safety. 2005; 1: 33-40
        • Quillivan R.R.
        • Burlison J.D.
        • Browne E.K.
        • Scott S.D.
        • Hoffman J.M.
        Patient safety culture and the second victim phenomenon: Connecting culture to staff distress in nurses.
        Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2016; 42: 377-386https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42053-2
        • Scott S.D.
        • Hirschinger L.E.
        • Cox K.R.
        • McCoig M.
        • Brandt J.
        • Hall L.W.
        The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events.
        Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2009; 18: 325-330https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.032870
        • Scott S.D.
        • Hirschinger L.E.
        • Cox K.R.
        • McCoig M.
        • Hahn-Cover K.
        • Epperly K.M.
        • Hall L.W.
        Caring for our own: Deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team.
        Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2010; 36: 233-240https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(10)36038-7
        • Sexton J.B.
        • Helmreich R.L.
        • Neilands T.B.
        • Rowan K.
        • Vella K.
        • Boyden J.
        • Thomas E.J.
        The safety attitudes questionnaire: Psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.
        BMC Health Services Research. 2006; 644https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
        • Singer S.J.
        • Moore S.C.
        • Meterko M.
        • Williams S.
        Development of a short-form learning organization survey: The LOS-27.
        Medical Care Research and Review. 2012; 69: 432-459https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558712448135
        • Sorra J.S.
        • Nieva V.F.
        Hospital survey on patient safety culture.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2004
        • Tucker A.L.
        • Nembhard I.M.
        • Edmondson A.C.
        Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units.
        Management Science. 2007; 53: 894-907https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0692
        • Waring J.J.
        Beyond blame: Cultural barriers to medical incident reporting.
        Social Science and Medicine. 2005; 60: 1927-1935https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.055
        • White A.A.
        • Brock D.M.
        • McCotter P.I.
        • Hofeldt R.
        • Edrees H.H.
        • Wu A.W.
        • Gallagher T.H.
        Risk managers' descriptions of programs to support second victims after adverse events.
        Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. 2015; 34: 30-40https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21169
        • Wu A.W.
        Medical error: The second victim.
        British Medical Journal. 2000; 320: 726-727https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726