Advertisement

Validation of the RAISE (Readiness Assessment of Independence for Specialty Encounters) Tool: Provider-Based Transition Evaluation

Published:April 09, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.03.019

      Highlights

      • Providers benefit from developmental guidelines to educate on skill mastery.
      • Expert raters established content validity of skill assessment tool for providers.
      • Findings suggest tool items are relevant, clear, and developmentally-appropriate.
      • Psychosocial domains rated as highly relevant and clear, provide important context.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The aim of this study was to establish content validity of a developmentally based assessment tool of readiness for medical independence for specialty providers.

      Design and methods

      The validation process used expert panel evaluation to assess the items believed to measure the desired content in the nine age-based scales within the RAISE (Readiness Assessment of Independence for Specialty Encounters) tool. Experts in child development and transition rated items on relevance, clarity and developmental appropriateness via electronic survey. Statistical analyses included calculation of interrater agreement (IRA), content validity indices (CVIs), and factorial validity indices (FVI).

      Results

      A total of 135 items were rated by 36 experts. Mean I-CVIs for 123 items across nine developmental scales met criteria for retention, ranging from 0.76 (threshold) to 1.00 (excellent). Mean I-CVIs for all 25 items across the five psychosocial stressor scales met criteria for retention, ranging from 0.92 to 1.00 (excellent).

      Conclusions

      Findings from the current content validation study suggest that items on the revised RAISE tool are relevant, clear, and developmentally-appropriate as rated by experts in the fields of child development and transition. The tool, consisting of age based scales (ages birth-2, 3–4, 5–6, 7–8, 9–11, 12–13, 14–15, 16–17, 18–21), is shown to have content validity of the retained items meeting criteria.

      Practice implications

      With content validity of the RAISE tool established by experts, this developmentally based assessment tool can be integrated into practice to assist providers in educating patients around skills of medical independence which could improve transition outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Betz C.L.
        SPN position statement: Transition of pediatric patients into adult care.
        Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2017; 35: 160-164
        • Bond J.
        • Shanske S.
        • Hoffman R.
        • Ross A.M.
        Piloting a structured developmental tool to assess transition readiness for youth with special health-care needs: A mixed-methods exploration of health-care provider experiences.
        Journal of Child Health Care. 2020; 24: 92-105
        • Cicchetti D.V.
        • Sparrow S.A.
        Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.
        American Journal of Mental Deficiency. 1981; 86: 127-137
        • Cohen S.E.
        • Hooper S.R.
        • Javalkar K.
        • Haberman C.
        • Fenton N.
        • Lai H.
        • Ferris M.
        Self-management and transition readiness assessment: Concurrent, predictive and discriminant validation of the STARx questionnaire.
        Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2015; 30: 668-676
        • Cooley W.C.
        • Sagerman P.J.
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        • American Academy of Family Physicians
        • American College of Physicians, & Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group
        Supporting the healthcare transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 128: 182-200
        • Davis L.L.
        Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts.
        Applied Nursing Research. 1992; 5: 194-197
        • Dwyer-Matzky K.
        • Blatt A.
        • Asselin B.L.
        • Wood D.L.
        Lack of preparedness for pediatric to adult-oriented health care transition in hospitalized adolescents and young adults.
        Academic Pediatrics. 2018; 18: 102-110
        • Ferris M.
        • Cohen S.
        • Haberman C.
        • Javalkar K.
        • Massengill S.
        • Mahan J.D.
        • Hooper S.R.
        Self-management and transition readiness assessment: Development, reliability, and factor structure of the STARx questionnaire.
        Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2015; 30: 691-699
        • Fleiss J.L.
        Statistical methods for rates and proportions.
        2nd ed. Wiley, New York, NY1981
        • Grant J.
        • Kinney M.
        Using the Delphi technique to examine the content validity of nursing diagnoses.
        Nursing Diagnosis. 1992; 3: 12-22
        • Hagan J.F.
        • Duncan P.M.
        Bright futures pocket guide.
        4th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL2017
        • Hart L.C.
        • Diaz-Gonzalez de Ferries M.
        • Nazareth M.
        • Faldowski R.A.
        • Rak E.
        • Hooper S.R.
        • van Tilburg M.A.L.
        Evaluation of the TRxANSITION index-parent version for assessment of readiness to transition to adult care among youth with chronic conditions.
        Pediatric Nursing. 2020; 2: 1-8
        • IBM Corp
        IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 25.0..
        IBM Corp, Armonk, NY2017
        • Kieckhefer G.M.
        • Trahms C.M.
        Supporting development of children with chronic conditions: From compliance toward shared management.
        Pediatric Nursing. 2000; 26: 354-363
        • Lebrun-Harris L.A.
        • McManus M.A.
        • Ilango S.M.
        • Cyr M.
        • McLellan S.B.
        • Mann M.Y.
        • White P.H.
        Transition planning among us youth with and without special health care needs.
        Pediatrics. 2018; 142
        • Lynn M.R.
        Determination and quantification of content validity.
        Nursing Research. 1986; 35: 382-385
        • Mazzucato M.
        • Visonà Dalla Pozza L.
        • Minichiello C.
        • Manea S.
        • Barbieri S.
        • Toto E.
        • Vianello A.
        • Facchin P.
        The epidemiology of transition into adulthood of rare diseases patients: Results from a population-based registry.
        International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15
        • National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners
        NAPNAP releases new position statement supporting the transition from pediatric to adult-focused health care.
        • O’Sullivan-Oliveira J.
        • Fernandes S.M.
        • Borges L.F.
        • Fishman L.N.
        Transition of pediatric patients to adult care: An analysis of provider perceptions across discipline and role.
        Pediatric Nursing. 2014; 40 (142): 113-120
        • Polit D.F.
        • Beck C.T.
        • Owen S.V.
        Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.
        Research in Nursing & Health. 2007; 30: 459-467
        • Rubio D.M.
        • Berg-Weger M.
        • Tebb S.S.
        • Lee E.S.
        • Rauch S.
        Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research.
        Social Work Research. 2003; 27: 94-104
        • Sawicki G.S.
        • Lukens-Bull K.
        • Yin X.
        • Demars N.
        • Huang I.-C.
        • Livingood W.
        • Wood D.
        Measuring the transition readiness of youth with special healthcare needs: Validation of the TRAQ--transition readiness assessment questionnaire.
        Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2011; 36: 160-171
        • Sawin K.J.
        • Margolis R.
        • MacFarlane Bookman J.R.
        • Bellin M.H.
        • Logan L.R.
        • Woodward J.
        • Brei T.J.
        Analysis of self-management and transition readiness instruments for clinical practice.
        in: Betz C. Coyne I. Transition from pediatric to adult healthcare Services for Adolescents and Young Adults with long-term conditions. Springer, Cham2020
        • Schwartz L.A.
        • Daniel L.C.
        • Brumley L.D.
        • Barakat L.P.
        • Wesley K.M.
        • Tuchman L.K.
        Measures of readiness to transition to adult health care for youth with chronic physical health conditions: A systematic review and recommendations for measurement testing and development.
        Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2014; 39: 588-601
        • Sharma N.
        • O’Hare K.
        • Antonelli R.C.
        • Sawicki G.S.
        Transition care: Future directions in education, health policy, and outcomes research.
        Academic Pediatrics. 2014; 14: 120-127
        • Stinson J.
        • Kohut S.A.
        • Spiegel L.
        • White M.
        • Gill N.
        • Colbourne G.
        • Kaufman M.
        A systematic review of transition readiness and transfer satisfaction measures for adolescents with chronic illness.
        International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2014; 26: 159-174
        • Turkel S.
        • Pao M.
        Late consequences of chronic pediatric illness.
        The Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2007; 30: 819-835
        • Waltz C.F.
        • Strickland O.L.
        • Lenz E.R.
        Measurement in nursing and health research.
        3rd ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY2005
        • White P.H.
        • Cooley W.C.
        • Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        • American Academy of Family Physicians, & American College of Physicians
        Supporting the health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home.
        Pediatrics. 2018; 142