Highlights
- •Perinatal loss is a global health issue with profound psychosocial effects on parents and their families.
- •Current perinatal bereavement care provided by healthcare professionals does not adequately meet the needs of patients.
- •High-quality CPGs can provide reliable evidence about perinatal bereavement care.
- •Our manuscript appraised the methodological quality of the existing CPGs, hoping to improve clinical practice.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate and analyze the methodological quality of the published
clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perinatal bereavement care and provide a reference
for implementing best clinical practices.
Methods
We performed a systematic and comprehensive search in five electronic databases (PubMed,
The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Database), eight guideline databases,
and six websites of professional organizations from March 2021 to June 2021. Four
researchers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II)
instrument to appraise the selected CPGs independently. The inter-rater reliability
of AGREE II domains was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient with
95% CI.
Results
We included a total of 8 CPGs. The mean scores of six domains ranged from the lowest
score of 46.61% (editorial independence) to the highest score of 87.85% (clarity of
presentation). Subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference. Each domain achieved
“good” and “very good” intraclass reliability. Two CPGs were deemed as grade A (strongly
recommended), five were rated as grade B (recommended with modifications), and one
was evaluated as grade C (not recommended).
Conclusions
Healthcare professionals in obstetrics and neonatology play an important role in helping
bereaved parents and families to cope with perinatal loss. High-quality CPGs for perinatal
bereavement care can serve as useful resources to improve the quality and outcomes
of clinical practice. More efforts should be made to disseminate the best practices
for perinatal bereavement care. When implementing GCPs in countries or regions with
different backgrounds, professional translations, strict validations, and cultural
adaptations should be taken into account.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and FamiliesAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project.Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003; 12: 18-23
- Investigation of the experiences of mothers living through prenatal loss incidents: A qualitative study.The Journal of Nursing Research: JNR. 2019; 27e22
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l’Association Medicale Canadienne. 2010; 182: E839-E842
- AGREE II-improving the quality of clinical care.Lancet (London, England). 2010; 376: 1128-1129
- Impact of pregnancy loss on psychological functioning and grief outcomes.Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2018; 45: 525-533
- Investigating factors associate to nurses’ attitudes towards perinatal bereavement care.Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2008; 17: 509-518
- A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: The RIGHT statement.Annals of Internal Medicine. 2017; 166: 128-132
- Grief reaction and psychosocial impacts of child death and stillbirth on bereaved north Indian parents: A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2021; 16e0240270
- The parental experience of pregnancy after perinatal loss.Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN. 2008; 37: 525-537
- Effects of an educational bereavement program on health care professionals’ perceptions of perinatal loss.Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2002; 33: 180-186
- Mental health symptoms and work-related stressors in hospital midwives and NICU nurses: A mixed methods study.Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018; 9: 364
- Perinatal bereavement: A principle-based concept analysis.Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013; 69: 2389-2400
- Perinatal grief and post-traumatic stress disorder in pregnancy after perinatal loss: A longitudinal study protocol.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18: 2874
- Impact of perinatal death on the social and family context of the parents.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3421
- Stillbirths: Recall to action in high-income countries.Lancet (London, England). 2016; 387: 691-702
- Evaluation of an international educational programme for health care professionals on best practice in the management of a perinatal death: IMproving perinatal mortality review and outcomes via education (IMPROVE).BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16: 376
- Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: A meta-epidemiological study.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018; 93: 45-55
- Providing support for neonatal intensive care unit Health care professionals: A bereavement debriefing program.American Journal of Perinatology. 2022; 39: 401-408
- National Standards for bereavement care following pregnancy loss and perinatal death.2019
- Sharing experiences to improve bereavement support and clinical care after stillbirth: Report of the 7th annual meeting of the international stillbirth Alliance.Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013; 92: 352-361
- Development, validation and reliability testing of “Perinatal bereavement care confidence scale (PBCCS)”.Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives. 2020; 33: e311-e319
- Stillbirths: Rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030.Lancet (London, England). 2016; 387: 587-603
- Development and evaluation of TEARDROP - a perinatal bereavement care training programme for healthcare professionals.Midwifery. 2021; 98102978
- Assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines on irritable bowel syndrome using the AGREE II instrument.Digestion. 2020; 101: 355-365
- Obstetric care consensus no, 10.Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; 135: e110-e132
- Midwives’ experience of delivery care in late foetal death: A qualitative study.Midwifery. 2018; 66: 127-133
- Workplace experience of parents coping with perinatal loss: A scoping review.Work (Reading, Mass.). 2021; 69: 411-421
- Stillbirth bereavement care pathway.2020
- The impact of stillbirth on bereaved parents: A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2018; 13e0191635
- Guidelines for health care professionals supporting families experiencing a perinatal loss.Paediatrics & Child Health. 2001; 6: 469-490
- Clinical practice guideline for care around stillbirth and neonatal death.2020
- Understanding stillbirth stigma: A scoping literature review.Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives. 2020; 33: 207-218
- Preparing nurses and midwives to provide perinatal bereavement care: A systematic scoping review.Nurse Education Today. 2021; 103104962
- Midwives’ experience of providing bereavement care for women after perinatal death: A qualitative study.Chinese Journal of Nursing. 2021; 56: 393-398
- Queensland clinical guidelines: Stillbirth care.2019
- The perinatal loss care educational programme and its evaluation.Zdravstveno Varstvo. 2019; 59: 1-7
- Stillbirth and perinatal care: Are professionals trained to address parents' needs?.Midwifery. 2018; 64: 53-59
- The relationship of attachment theory and perinatal loss.Death Studies. 1999; 23: 257-270
- A critical appraisal of the quality of head and neck cancer imaging guidelines using the AGREE II tool: A EuroAIM initiative.Cancer Medicine. 2019; 8: 209-215
- Clinical practice guideline development manual, third edition: A quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action.Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2013; 148: S1-S55
- Late intrauterine fetal death and stillbirth (green-top guideline no. 55).2010
- The perinatal bereavement project: Development and evaluation of supportive guidelines for families experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death in Southeast Brazil-a quasi-experimental before-and-after study.Reproductive Health. 2021; 18: 5
- Mothers’ perception of quality of services from Health centers after perinatal loss.Electronic Physician. 2016; 8: 2006-2017
- The RESPECT study for consensus on global bereavement care after stillbirth.International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2020; 149: 137-147
- All bereaved parents are entitled to good care after stillbirth: A mixed-methods multicentre study (INSIGHT).BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018; 125: 160-170
- Depression, anxiety, PTSD, and OCD after stillbirth: A systematic review.BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021; 21: 782
- Newborn mortality.(Retrieved April 2, 2022, from)
- Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: A systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021; 29: 2885-2893
Article info
Publication history
Published online: May 27, 2022
Accepted:
April 10,
2022
Received in revised form:
April 5,
2022
Received:
December 19,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.