Highlights
- •Guidelines regarding infant physical activity, screen time and sleep were released by the World Health Organisation in 2019.
- •Guidelines are only effective if the relevant stakeholders are aware of and implement the recommendation.
- •Participants had a sound knowledge of the guidelines and provided consistent advice.
- •Specific advice and recommendations about screen time were lacking.
- •Professional development to translate the guidelines into clinical and educational practises would be beneficial.
Abstract
Background
Global guidelines regarding infant physical activity, screen time and sleep were released
by the World Health Organisation in 2019. Clinician and Early Childhood Educator's
knowledge and advice given to parents regarding this content is unknown. The aims
of this study were to determine the advice given to parents regarding infant care.
This will enable a baseline from which future interventions and multidisciplinary
professional development can be compared and reviewed.
Methods
80 Clinicians (Medical, Nursing, Allied Health) and Early Childhood Educators from
a local health district in NSW Australia completed an online survey. Medical records
(N = 272) were also reviewed to determine if the documentation included advice in accordance
with guidelines.
Findings
Staff were aware that infant guidelines contributes to positive health outcomes (all
>85%). Nursing entered the most information into the medical record with >80% of files
containing general advice about infant physical activity and sleep. Only 30% of entries
contained evidence of guideline specific information. Minimal entries from all clinicians
contained information about screen time (2%).
Discussion
The majority of clinicians and Early Childhood Educators were aware of the content
of the guidelines and the advice they report to provide is consistent. Medical record
documentation regarding the specificity of advice provided is lacking.
Application to practice
This study provides a baseline from which professional development interventions aimed
at increasing compliance to infant guidelines can be compared.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and FamiliesAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years (birth to 5 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep.(Available from)www.health.gov.auDate: 2017
- AGREE next steps consortium. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care.Preventive Medicine. 2010; 51: 421-424
- Longitudinal associations between infant movement behaviours and development.International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2022; 19: 10
- Is sleep duration associated with childhood obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity. 2008; 16: 265-274
- Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2016
- User compliance with documenting on a track and trigger-based observation and response chart: A two-phase multi-site audit study.Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017; 73: 2892-2902
- Improving documentation of quality measures in the electronic health record.The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2015; : 308-312
- How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability.Implementation Science. 2011; 6: 26
- Proportion of infants meeting the Australian 24-hour movement guidelines for the early years: Data from the Melbourne InFANT program.BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 856
- Child care Centre adherence to infant physical activity and screen time recommendations in Australia, Canada and the United States: An observational study.Infant Behavior & Development. 2018; 50: 88-97
- Weekly group tummy time classes are feasible and acceptable to mothers with infants: A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2020; 6: 155
- Documentation compliance of in-patient files: A cross sectional study from an East India state.Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2020; 8: 994-997
- The relationships between screen use and health indicators among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers: A Meta-analysis and systematic review.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 7324
- Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behaviour and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years).BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 868
- Knowledge and practice of documentation among nurses in Ahmadu Bello University teaching hospital (Abuth) Zaria, Kaduna state.IOSR Journal of Nursing and health Science. 2015; 4: 1-6
- Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for the early years (0–4 years): An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep.BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 874
- Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2011; 24: 741-744
- The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology [STROBE] statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies.Gaceta Sanitaria. 2008; 22: 144-150
- Development of WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep for children less than 5 years of age.Journal of Physical Activity & Health. 2020; 17: 96-100
- Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age.(Available from)
- Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2018
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 24, 2022
Accepted:
June 17,
2022
Received in revised form:
May 19,
2022
Received:
November 8,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.