Motivational interviewing approach and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Correspondence

Dear Editor, we would like to discuss “ Best shot: A motivational interviewing approach to address vaccine hesitancy in pediatric outpatient settings ().” According to , caregivers with more children and higher vaccine hesitancy scores were more likely to postpone or deny vaccinations, while those under 30 years old or with greater incomes were less likely to do so (). A condensed motivational interviewing instruction session may be clinically significant in reducing vaccine hesitancy among this demographic, according to Jamison et al.'s findings (). In order to enhance immunization rates and make sure that doubters can easily obtain trustworthy information, it is essential to increase public confidence in authorities, medical experts, and scientists. Depending on a number of factors, local public health initiatives to regulate COVID-19 may encounter support or opposition. The dread of vaccines, which has been linked to local healthcare system trust (), serves as the finest illustration. The level of trust a person has in the public health system in their community determines how ready they are to implement public health measures for epidemic management during the COVID-19 outbreak (). There is evidence that people's preferences for acceptance alter as circumstances do. There is evidence that people's preferences for acceptance fluctuate as their circumstances do. Understanding the several reluctant events that occur next is crucial. It is crucial to comprehend the various hesitation phenomena that come from this. To evaluate the impacts of COVID-19 immunization, local public health initiatives against COVID-19, and the deteriorating COVID-19 status, a longitudinal study paradigm should be utilized rather than the conventional cross-sectional approach.