Advertisement

Development and validation of the parents' healthcare needs scale for adolescents with congenital heart disease

Published:December 16, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.12.006

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The healthcare needs of parents of adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) have been under-investigated as no valid and reliable tools have been developed for assessing their needs. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate the Parents' Healthcare Needs Scale for adolescents with CHD (PHNS-CHD).

      Design and methods

      A multi-method approach and multi-phase design were employed. Phase one referred to generating scale items based on emerging themes in the literature, and phase two showed the validation process, divided into three steps. Step one tested the content and face validity of the first version of the PHNS-CHD. After that, step two described the initial psychometric validation process of scale using an exploratory factorial analysis (EFA). Then, step three confirmed the PHNS-CHD factorial structure and assessed its internal consistency.

      Results

      The PHNS-CHD showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct, and internal consistency and stability. Specifically, it had 22 items grouped into five domains, labeled as follows: Healthcare education to the child; to be supported as a parent, clinical support to the child, the continuum of care to the child; emotional support to the child.

      Conclusions

      The PHNS-CHD is a psychometrically robust measure for assessing the healthcare needs of parents of adolescents with CHD.

      Practice implications

      The PHNS-CHD might help clinicians, especially pediatric nurses, assess the healthcare needs of parents of adolescents with CHD and design adequate care plans for the whole family.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • van der Bom T.
        • Zomer A.C.
        • Zwinderman A.H.
        • Meijboom F.J.
        • Bouma B.J.
        • Mulder B.J.M.
        The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease.
        Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2011; 8: 50-60https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.166
        • Bratt E.L.
        • Burström Å.
        • Hanseus K.
        • Rydberg A.
        • Berghammer M.
        • On Behalf on the STEPSTONES-CHD Consortium
        Do not forget the parents-Parents’ concerns during transition to adult care for adolescents with congenital heart disease.
        Child: Care, Health and Development. 2018; 44: 278-284https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12529
        • Brekke I.
        Health and educational success in adolescents: A longitudinal study.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1966-0
        • Burström Å.
        • Öjmyr-Joelsson M.
        • Bratt E.-L.
        • Lundell B.
        • Nisell M.
        Adolescents with congenital heart disease and their parents.
        The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2016; 31: 399-404https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000288
        • Chen C.W.
        • Ho C.L.
        • Su W.J.
        • Wang J.K.
        • Chung H.T.
        • Lee P.C.
        • Hwang B.T.
        Initial validation of a healthcare needs scale for young people with congenital heart disease.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2018; 74: 223-231https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13390
        • Chen C.-W.
        • Su W.-J.
        • Chiang Y.-T.
        • Shu Y.-M.
        • Moons P.
        Healthcare needs of adolescents with congenital heart disease transitioning into adulthood: A Delphi survey of patients, parents, and healthcare providers.
        European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing: Journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology. 2017; 16: 125-135https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515116643622
        • Chiang Y.-T.
        • Chen C.-W.
        • Su W.-J.
        • Wang J.-K.
        • Lu C.-W.
        • Li Y.-F.
        • Moons P.
        Between invisible defects and visible impact: The life experiences of adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2015; 71: 599-608https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12546
        • Clarizia N.A.
        • Chahal N.
        • Manlhiot C.
        • Kilburn J.
        • Redington A.N.
        • McCrindle B.W.
        Transition to adult health care for adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease: Perspectives of the patient, parent and health care provider.
        The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2009; 25: e317-e322
        • Dellafiore F.
        • Flocco S.F.
        • Arrigoni C.
        • Barello S.
        • Nania T.
        • Russo M.G.
        • Caruso R.
        Italian validation of the healthcare needs scale for youth with congenital heart disease and its short-form development.
        Congenital Heart Disease. 2020; 15: 167-180https://doi.org/10.32604/CHD.2020.012438
        • Dillman D.A.
        • Smyth J.D.
        • Christian L.M.
        Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method (fourth).
        Wiley, 2014
        • Flocco S.F.
        • Caruso R.
        • Dellafiore F.
        • Pittella F.
        • Giamberti A.
        • Micheletti A.
        • Chessa M.
        The effects of a standardized set of educational interventions on the health perception of adolescents with congenital heart disease (transition model): Preliminary results of a quasi-experimental study.
        Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 2018; 19: 386-393https://doi.org/10.1714/2922.29372
        • Flocco S.F.
        • Dellafiore F.
        • Caruso R.
        • Giamberti A.
        • Micheletti A.
        • Negura D.G.
        • Chessa M.
        Improving health perception through a transition care model for adolescents with congenital heart disease.
        Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019; 20: 253-260https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000770
        • Hsieh H.
        • Shannon S.
        Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15: 1277-1288
        • Khair K.
        • Pelentsov L.
        Assessing the supportive care needs of parents with a child with a bleeding disorder using the parental needs scale for rare diseases (PNS-RD): A single-Centre pilot study.
        Haemophilia: the Official Journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2019; 25: 831-837https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13826
        • Landolt M.A.
        • Ystrom E.
        • Stene-Larsen K.
        • Holmstrøm H.
        • Vollrath M.E.
        Exploring causal pathways of child behavior and maternal mental health in families with a child with congenital heart disease: A longitudinal study.
        Psychological Medicine. 2014; 44: 3421-3433https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002894
        • Lawoko S.
        • Soares J.J.F.
        Distress and hopelessness among parents of children with congenital heart disease, parents of children with other diseases, and parents of healthy children.
        Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2002; 52: 193-208
        • Lawshe C.
        A quantitative approach to content validity.
        Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28: 563-575
        • Lincoln Y.
        • Guba E.
        But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation.
        New Directions for Evaluation. 1986; 30: 73-84
        • Moceri P.
        • Goossens E.
        • Hascoet S.
        • Checler C.
        • Bonello B.
        • Ferrari E.
        • Acar P.
        • Fraisse A.
        From adolescents to adults with congenital heart disease: The role of transition.
        European Journal of Pediatrics. 2015; 174: 847-854https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-015-2557-x
        • Pei L.
        • Kang Y.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Yan H.
        Prevalence and risk factors of congenital heart defects among live births: A population-based cross-sectional survey in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China.
        BMC Pediatrics. 2017; 17: 18https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0784-1
        • Polit D.F.
        • Beck C.T.
        Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice.
        in: Critical care nurse. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins Health, 2014https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2014573
        • Rattray J.
        • Jones M.C.
        Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.
        Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007; 16: 234-243https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
        • Reise S.P.
        • Waller N.G.
        • Comrey A.L.
        Factor analysis and scale revision.
        Psychological Assessment. 2000; 12: 287-297
        • Stout K.K.
        • Daniels C.J.
        • Chair V.
        • Aboulhosn J.A.
        • Bozkurt B.
        • Broberg C.S.
        • Van Hare G.F.
        Writing committee members* 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease.
        Circulation. 2018; 139: 698-800https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000603
        • Watkins M.W.
        Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice.
        Journal of Black Psychology. 2018; 44: 219-246https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
        • Wei H.
        • Roscigno C.I.
        • Hanson C.C.
        • Swanson K.M.
        Families of children with congenital heart disease: A literature review.
        Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2015; 44: 494-511https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.08.005
        • Wilson F.R.
        • Pan W.
        • Schumsky D.A.
        Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio.
        Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2012; 45: 197-210